Did russia pay to havr jill stein on the racr
![did russia pay to havr jill stein on the racr did russia pay to havr jill stein on the racr](https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-P2vOm9a9pSc/WQLNCburfmI/AAAAAAAAWdQ/zARUq1WyAZYuSutUx2CqKCZbygfr_smagCLcB/s1600/Vladimir%2BPutin%252BMichael%2BFlynn%252BJill%2BStein%252BPredatory%252BCentral%2BForehead%2BContraction%252BInsincere%2BSmile%252BPartial%2BEyelid%2BClosure%252BBody%2BLanguage%252BExpert%252BEmotional%2BIntelligence%252BNonverbal%252BSpeaker%252BKeynote%252BConsultant%252BLos%2BAngeles%252BLas%2BVegas%252BCalifornia%252BNYC%252BOrlando%252BW.png)
There is also the general election version of Sanders, who fought like hell to get Clinton elected. There is the primary version of Sanders who barely brought up the emails, but who certainly made the case that Clinton was part of a corrupt system. Harry: I think there are two different versions of Sanders. Micah: Wouldn’t Clinton have had those problems anyway? Natesilver: I think the last couple of months of Sanders’s campaign entrenched the notion that Clinton was corrupt and that the system was rigged. It played into the elitism idea that people developed around her. Talking paid Goldman Sachs speeches and all that. That’s beside the point, though.Ĭlare.malone: He saddled her with establishment baggage, though, in a pretty effective way, right from the start. Micah: He ran and raised money long past the point where it was clear he would lose. For one thing, he didn’t troll sad Democrats into paying for a recount, and then sorta give up halfway through. Natesilver: Don’t compare Sanders to Stein, please. Can Clinton blame Sanders for her loss?Ĭlare.malone: I think that’s a harder case to make by hard numbers, but ideologically, sure - he played a part in her loss. Micah: OK, so let’s go to the OG Stein: Sanders. And Jill Stein was a pretty bleeping minor story in the 2016 campaign. Natesilver: Y’know, I covered the campaign. Micah: But what about this idea that Stein helped keep the anti-Clinton flame on the left - first lit by Sanders - burning? That doesn’t wind up netting very many votes for HRC. The breakdown might have been something like 35 percent Clinton, 10 percent Trump and 55 percent wouldn’t vote. But both pre-election polls and the national exit poll suggests that a lot of them wouldn’t have voted at all, if they’d been forced to pick between the two major candidates.
![did russia pay to havr jill stein on the racr did russia pay to havr jill stein on the racr](https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/11/07/22/3A28368B00000578-3914778-image-m-54_1478555969729.jpg)
You have to assume that almost all of Stein’s voters would have gone to Clinton. And the rub is Pennsylvania, which was close but not that close. Natesilver ( Nate Silver, editor in chief): I don’t really buy it. What would all those would-be Democrats be doing, then, if not voting for Stein? Going to Clinton? Writing in their mother-in-laws? And we’ve got those Stein/Trump margins in keys states being similar.